United States of America vs Ike Brown Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

United States of America vs Ike cook - demonstrate ExampleThis essay will summarize the complaints and evidence of that the brass presented against Ike brownness, his defense, as sanitary as stimulation on the strangeness of this situation, that is, of the political sympathies using the voting rights act to prosecute a dimmed bit for the violation of white voters and candidates rights. The fundamental complaint against Ike Brown by the United States government is that he abused his position as chair of the participatory Committee in his county to unfairly cheque white voters from participating in the primary elections when they had the right to, and unfairly persecuted white candidates who were running in those elections. some(a) of the governments allegations entirely attempted to demonstrate that Brown had a strong bias towards white candidates this includes statements by Brown criticizing black voters who chose to vote for white candidates, and other acts of startspo ken intimidation such as naming a list of white democrats who he discouraged to vote in the election. They also accused him and the committee he chaired of many procedural violations such as mis-handling the counting of absentee ballots, and quiting campaigning within and around polling stations. They also present that the elections committee violated state policy by only having about six percent of the polling officers for the Democratic primary be white, even though twenty percent of the Democratic population was white, though with a sample size as small as polling officers and a country of only about 11,000 people, it is scarce surprising this disparity could exist. A great deal of the governments evidence thus simply tried to show that Brown had a preference for black voters, polling officers and elections officials. But the bulk of their evidence rests on absentee voter turnout laws, and the Governments assertion that Brown abused absentee balloting procedure in redact to both favor black candidates and prevent white voters from participating in the electoral process, as well as manipulating assisted balloting procedures to favor black candidates. Mississippi state election law has cardinal features that are meant to make elections more accessible absentee balloting and assisted balloting. Both have strict controls. Absentee balloting is for people who, for some reason, are not equal to(p) to be present, for instance if they are in schoolhouse out of state or deployed with the armed forces, but there are strict controls on what excuses allow a person to use an absentee ballot. Assisted balloting is when someone else assists the voter in filling out their ballot, which is only allowed to be done in the case of blindness, physical disability that prevents someone from being able to vote, or demonstrable illiteracy, and who have requested assistance in filling out their ballot. The US Government provided evidence that Brown violated these procedures. The Government contends that Brown accepted and actually even pursued absentee ballots from black voters who were currently living within the county and had no reason whatsoever to vote via an absentee ballot. Furthermore, they presented witness testimony that these ballots were modify by people other than the voters (assisted balloting) despite the fact that the voter was in no way handicapped or illiterate and had not requested assistance in filling out their ballot. The government contended that Brown and his associates essentially filled in absentee ballots for black people who were unlikely to vote, brought the ballot in favor of a black candidate for them to authorize, and then sent it away. In some cases they